Case 2214115/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Abayomi v CL1 Realisations Limited (formerly Cazoo Limited) In administration and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 2214115/2023
- Decision date
- 16 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smart
Parties
3 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Smart heard this case in public at Birmingham (by video) on 7 August 2025. The claimant Mr K Abayomi appeared in person; neither respondent attended. The claimant was employed by the first respondent (CL1 Realisations Limited, formerly Cazoo Limited, in administration) for a brief period in June 2023. The Judge granted relief from sanction in respect of an earlier unless order regarding the holiday pay claim, and considered an application under Rule 22 (formerly Rule 21) which was not engaged because a response had been presented.
The Judge found that the first respondent terminated the contract first; the claimant's purported resignation after being told he was being dismissed had no effect. The contract permitted PILON at clause 16.1, and the claimant accepted under oath he had received the £960 gross PILON for two weeks' notice. Accordingly the breach of contract / notice pay claim failed. The holiday pay claim also failed because the claimant accepted he had been paid for the 1.5 days of accrued but untaken leave to which he was entitled.
The sick pay claim succeeded: the Judge awarded the claimant £192 gross, deducted unlawfully from his wages. The injury to feelings claim was rejected as no discrimination claims had been pleaded, and the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to award interest on unlawful deductions of wages.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Sick pay claim succeeded; £192 gross awarded for unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £192 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay/breach of contract claim dismissed: claimant had been paid the correct two weeks' PILON of £960 in accordance with the contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay claim dismissed: claimant accepted under oath he had been paid for 1.5 days' accrued leave (£144 gross). PDF text was truncated from 40,290 to 15,000 chars. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £192
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
8 references- Rule 22 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 21 (former)
- Thind v Salveson Logistics Limited UKEAT/0487/09/DA
- Minnoch and others v Interserve FM Limited [2023] EAT 35
- Wakeman v Boys and Maughan Solicitors and another [2024] EAT 39
- Sivanandan v Independent office for Police Conduct and another [2025] EAT 7
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.