Case 2304457/2023 · Employment Tribunal

P Peat v Helskce Limited Held at: London South Employment Tribunals Hybrid: Ashford and CVP — 2026

Case reference: 2304457/2023
Decision date: 21 January 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Burge Representation
Venue: London South

Indexed: 25 April 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

P Peat

Respondent

Helskce Limited Held at: London South Employment Tribunals Hybrid: Ashford and CVP

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Burge heard this hybrid hearing in the respondent's absence. The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was upheld. The respondent was found to have breached s.8 Employment Rights Act 1996 by failing to give the claimant written itemised pay statements for April and May 2023. The claimant's resignation amounted to a constructive dismissal within s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996, and the unfair dismissal complaint succeeded. The judge applied a 25% uplift to the compensatory award under s.207A TULRCA for unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015. The holiday pay complaint was also upheld. Total payable £4,810.39, comprising basic award £660, compensatory loss of earnings £1,078, loss of statutory rights £500, holiday pay £567.60, unlawful deductions £470.71, ACAS uplift £654.08 and £880 for failure to provide written particulars.

Claims and outcomes

4 claims adjudicated

Claim type	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Constructive dismissal	Upheld	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	Upheld	—	£471
Holiday pay	Upheld	—	£568
Other	Upheld	—	£880

Source tags (gov.uk)

Unfair Dismissal
Unlawful Deduction from Wages
Working Time Regulations
Written Pay Statement and Written Statements

Legal tests applied

5 references

s.95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
s.8 Employment Rights Act 1996
s.207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015
s.38 Employment Act 2002

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £4,810
Basic award: £660
Compensatory award: £1,078

Source document

Primary record

The full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Download judgment (PDF)

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.