Case 2305178/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Ms MYS Chan v SALON +M Limited and 1 other — 2026
- Case reference
- 2305178/2025
- Decision date
- 27 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer Attendances
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer entered Rule 22 default judgment for two claimants against SALON +M Limited at London (South) by CVP. No ET3 response had been presented and the respondent was barred under Rule 22. Due to technical difficulties at the hearing, the matter was determined on the papers from the claimants' written remedy information of 26 January 2026. For the 1st claimant (Ms MYS Chan), the tribunal awarded £308.26 for unlawful deductions from wages in November and December 2025 and unpaid accrued holiday pay, £364 for one week's notice pay, and £728 (two weeks' wages) under s.38 Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars: total £1,400. For the 2nd claimant (Mr WSA Chan), the tribunal awarded £1,073.71 for unlawful deductions in October-December 2025 and accrued holiday pay, £435.89 for one week's notice pay, and £871.78 under s.38 Employment Act 2002: total £2,381.38. A post-hearing submission from the respondent was not in form ET3 and was not taken into account.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | 1st claimant Ms MYS Chan: unlawful deduction in November and December 2025 plus accrued holiday pay = £308.26. 2nd claimant Mr WSA Chan: unlawful deduction in October-December 2025 plus accrued holiday pay = £1,073.71. | Upheld | — | £1,382 |
| Breach of contract | 1st claimant: one week's notice pay £364.00. 2nd claimant: one week's notice pay £435.89. | Upheld | — | £800 |
| Other | Section 38 Employment Act 2002 awards for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars: 1st claimant two weeks' wages £728.00; 2nd claimant two weeks' wages £871.78. | Upheld | — | £1,600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,781
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 22 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.