Case 3200428/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Mcallan v Great Worqs Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 3200428/2024
- Decision date
- 10 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedMs N Mcallan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningJudgment by Employment Judge W A Allen KC at the East London Hearing Centre, with no attendance by the respondent (a company in voluntary liquidation; the liquidators confirmed they would not participate). The judge found the claimant was unfairly dismissed: there was a genuine redundancy situation but no fair process was followed and her selection for redundancy was not within the band of reasonable responses; her employment would in any event have ended on 7 March 2024 when the company entered insolvency. She was awarded a basic award of £1,286 and a compensatory award totalling £4,791.86 (unpaid wages to 7 March 2024 of £3,504.36 net, unpaid bonus of £787.50 net and loss of statutory rights of £500). Her wrongful dismissal/notice claim succeeded for £2,530.92 net (one month's contractual notice). Unpaid wages for 1-25 January 2024 (£1,768.60 net) and 1.03 days accrued holiday pay (£120.10 net) were awarded. An unlawful deduction from wages claim relating to employee pension contributions deducted but not paid over (from April 2023) was upheld at £1,234.06. The total payable was £11,731.54. The judge declined to award injury to feelings, noting it was not a head of compensation for any of the remedies sought in the ET1.
Claims and outcomes
5 claims adjudicated| Claim type | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Upheld | — | £6,078 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Upheld | — | £2,531 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld | — | £1,769 |
| Holiday pay | Upheld | — | £120 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld | — | £1,234 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,732
- Basic award
- £1,286
- Compensatory award
- £4,792
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.