Case 3201281/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Imran Siddique v London Domestic Appliances (UK) Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3201281/2023
- Decision date
- 24 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Elgot Members
- Panel members
- Ms M Legg, Mr P Lush
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Imran Siddique
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting as Employment Judge B Elgot with members Ms M Legg and Mr P Lush, gave unanimous judgment after a final hearing across nine days. The claimant's monetary claims were upheld: accrued holiday pay of £1,976.96, one week's notice pay of £458.77, and unlawful deductions in part for unlawfully deducted speeding/parking fines and tolls (£719.94) and unpaid travel time of 138 hours at £12 per hour plus £50 travel costs (£1,706). All three disability discrimination claims were dismissed. The s.13 direct discrimination and s.20 reasonable adjustments claims were not made out. The s.15 claim succeeded on the unfavourable treatment limb (the claimant was dismissed because of something arising from his OCD), but the respondent established a justification defence: dismissal was a proportionate means of achieving the legitimate aims of reasonable management of the business and protecting workforce, customers and the public from the claimant's conduct. The tribunal also made a Preparation Time Order of £360 (8 hours at £45) against the respondent for unreasonable conduct of proceedings and breach of tribunal orders. Total payable £5,221.67.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | £1,496.96 conceded plus £480 for 5 days in January and February 2023. | Upheld | — | £1,977 |
| Breach of contract | One week's average pay for unpaid notice (gross). | Upheld | — | £459 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Succeeds in part: speeding/parking fines and tolls £719.94 plus 138 hours of travel time at £12 plus £50 agreed travel costs (£1,706 total). | Upheld | — | £2,426 |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination (s.13 EqA) and failure to make reasonable adjustments (s.20 EqA) not made out. Section 15 EqA: unfavourable treatment because of something arising from disability was established but justification defence under s.15(1)(b) succeeded; claim ultimately fails. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,222
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- Equality Act 2010 s.13
- Equality Act 2010 s.15
- Equality Act 2010 s.20
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Hindmarch v North East Ambulance NHS Foundation Trust 2025 EAT 87
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.