Case 3300939/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Ezike (solicitor-advocate) For the v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300939/2024
- Decision date
- 17 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wyeth
- Panel members
- Mr M Kaltz, Ms K Omer
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr C Ezike (solicitor-advocate) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningJudgment by Employment Judge Wyeth with lay members Mr M Kaltz and Ms K Omer at Watford by CVP. The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed but that there was a 75% chance he would have been fairly dismissed in any event (Polkey reduction). A 50% contributory conduct reduction was applied to both basic and compensatory awards. The claimant's wrongful dismissal claim and his race discrimination claim were dismissed as not well-founded. By way of remedy for unfair dismissal (subject to the recoupment provisions), the respondent was ordered to pay £31,909.76: a basic award of £2,572 (£5,144 reduced by 50%); and a compensatory award of £29,337.76 covering past losses (£15,849.77 prescribed element after Polkey and contributory deductions) and future losses including loss of statutory rights, employment benefits (car allowance, private health care), pension loss and grossing-up (£13,487.99 non-prescribed element). The prescribed period for recoupment is 11 October 2023 to 13 November 2025.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Unfair dismissal upheld. Polkey reduction of 75% applied to compensatory award and 50% contributory conduct reduction applied to both basic and compensatory awards. Basic award £2,572 (after 50% reduction). Compensatory award £29,337.76 (prescribed element £15,849.77 plus non-prescribed element £13,487.99 grossed up). Recoupment applies. | Upheld | — | £31,910 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Wrongful dismissal claim fails. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Race discrimination claim not well-founded; fails. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £31,910
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,572
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £29,338
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- Polkey
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.