Case 3307752/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 3307752/2023
- Decision date
- 14 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Alliott, sitting alone, found that the claimant - a Market Place Manager running two betting shops - was unfairly dismissed by the respondent. The Tribunal accepted that the reason for dismissal was gross misconduct (a potentially fair reason) and that the respondent genuinely believed the claimant had committed gross misconduct, but found that this conclusion was not on reasonable grounds and that no employer acting reasonably would have treated the circumstances as a sufficient reason to dismiss.
The Tribunal found the matters relied on - leaving early, not escalating one PTL breach and limited picking up of responsible-gambling triggers - were relatively trivial; missing the Hard Stop threshold for one customer over an unusual short period of one hour twenty minutes was a clear error but the consequences had not been spelt out to employees, and the customer's exceptionally rapid wagering was atypical. The claimant's long service and exemplary record were not sufficiently taken into account, and the decision to dismiss was outside the range of reasonable responses.
PDF text was truncated; remedy figures were not stated in the available text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Liability only; remedy not addressed in this judgment. PDF text was truncated. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- British Home Stores Limited v Burchell
- Iceland Frozen Foods Limited v Jones
- s.122 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.123 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Polkey v A E Dayton Service Ltd
- Jury v ECC Quarries Limited
- Kilduff v Mind in Bradford
- Philander v Leonard Cheshire Disability
- AAH Pharmaceuticals Limited v Carmichael
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.