Case 3311175/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Gray v Coronet Flowers Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3311175/2024
- Decision date
- 24 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCooey Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Gray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 22 default judgment heard by Employment Judge McCooey via CVP after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time and did not attend. The complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and the claimant was unfairly dismissed.
The tribunal awarded a basic award of £9,487.50, a compensatory award of £6,247.38 net (calculated over 20.5 weeks: 8.5 weeks salary plus 3 months' notice) plus £500 loss of statutory rights, increased by 20% (£1,349.48) under s.207A TULR(C)A 1992 for unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015 (compensatory total with uplift £8,096.86). An award of £1,725 (4 weeks' gross pay) under s.38 Employment Act 2002 was made for breach of the duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars.
The complaints of unauthorised deduction from wages (£836.62 gross for 1-11 June 2024) and holiday pay (£133.69 for 41.5 accrued hours) were both well-founded. The breach of contract complaint relating to notice pay was dismissed on withdrawal. The total award is £20,279.67, payable within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Unfair dismissal upheld via rule 22 default judgment. Basic award £9,487.50, compensatory award £6,247.38 + £500 loss of statutory rights = £6,747.38, plus 20% s.207A ACAS uplift of £1,349.48 making compensatory total £8,096.86. Compensatory losses calculated over 20.5 weeks (8.5 weeks salary + 3 months' notice). | Upheld | — | £18,084 |
| Other | Failure to provide written statement of employment particulars - 4 weeks' gross pay under s.38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,725 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction for the period 1 to 11 June 2024. | Upheld | — | £837 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay accrued but untaken leave on termination (entitlement of 41.5 hours / 1 April-11 June 2024). | Upheld | — | £134 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,280
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £9,488
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £8,097
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024
- s.207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.