Case 6001922/2025 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 6001922/2025
- Decision date
- 22 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Glennie Representation
- Venue
- London Central
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Glennie determined the case in London Central after the respondent did not appear or send representation. The respondent's name was amended to Browd Medical Limited. The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on withdrawal.
The Tribunal upheld the claimant's complaints of unlawful deduction from wages (£6,626.09 covering pre- and post-contract periods), unpaid holiday pay (£897.44), breach of contract for non-payment of notice (£961.54), and breach of contract for non-reimbursement of expenses (£761.98), totalling £9,247.05. A 25% uplift for failure to comply with the ACAS Code was applied (£2,311.76).
The Tribunal further found that the respondent had conducted the proceedings unreasonably and made a preparation time order under rule 74 of £675 (15 hours at £45/hour). The total payable to the claimant was £12,233.81.
Claims and outcomes
10 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Non-payment of wages: £1,153.86 (pre-contract) plus £5,472.23 (post-contract). | Upheld | — | £6,626 |
| Holiday pay | Non-payment of holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £897 |
| Breach of contract | Non-payment of notice pay. | Upheld | — | £962 |
| Breach of contract | Non-reimbursement of expenses. | Upheld | — | £762 |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Non-payment of wages: £1,153.86 (pre-contract) plus £5,472.23 (post-contract). | Upheld | — | £6,626 |
| Holiday pay | Non-payment of holiday pay. | Upheld |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,234
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- ACAS Code of Practice
- rule 74 Employment Tribunals Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.