Case 6002245/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Pryke v Dentaprime UK plc — 2025
- Case reference
- 6002245/2025
- Decision date
- 13 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Carpenter Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Pryke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant brought complaints of unpaid holiday pay, unpaid redundancy pay, and unfair dismissal against the Respondent. The hearing was held by CVP at the East London Hearing Centre on 12 and 13 June 2025 before Employment Judge M Carpenter sitting alone, with the Claimant unrepresented and Mr Y Petrov for the Respondent.
All three complaints were well-founded. The Tribunal awarded £74.25 for unpaid holiday pay, £1,042.31 for unpaid redundancy pay, and a compensatory award of £2,311.85 for unfair dismissal (with no basic award payable). The total sum payable was £3,428.41.
Following oral judgment, the Respondent applied for £2,500 in costs under Rule 73 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, on the basis that the Claimant had rejected a settlement offer of around £7,000 prior to the hearing and had therefore acted unreasonably under Rule 74(2)(a). The application was refused. The Tribunal held that costs awards are the exception, that the Claimant had presented her case clearly, calmly and professionally as a litigant in person, and that her decision to reject the settlement offer was not demonstrably unreasonable but rather reflected the normal risks of litigation.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday pay of £74.25. | Upheld | — | £74 |
| Redundancy | Unpaid statutory redundancy pay of £1,042.31. | Upheld | — | £1,042 |
| Unfair dismissal | Unfair dismissal complaint upheld. No basic award payable; compensatory award of £2,311.85. Respondent's costs application against the Claimant under Rule 73 was refused. | Upheld | — | £2,312 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday pay of £74.25. | Upheld | — | £74 |
| Redundancy | Unpaid statutory redundancy pay of £1,042.31. | Upheld | — | £1,042 |
| Unfair dismissal | Unfair dismissal complaint upheld. No basic award payable; compensatory award of £2,311.85. Respondent's costs application against the Claimant under Rule 73 was refused. | Upheld | — | £2,312 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,428
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,312
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 22 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 73 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 74(2)(a) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.