Case 6004668/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Megan White v Too Creme de Coffee Ltd and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 6004668/2025
- Decision date
- 9 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms Megan White
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningJudgment on reconsideration arising from an earlier judgment of 31 July 2025 (which had awarded £400.73 holiday pay against the first respondent). The Employment Judge varied the previous judgment to include further sums that had been omitted on the misunderstanding that they had already been dealt with by separate order; the variation is in the interests of justice.
The additional sums included relate to: (a) unpaid wages of £1,627.45 (confirmed by the claimant on 13 June 2025 and not contested by the respondent); (b) failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars under s.38 Employment Act 2002, attracting an award of 2 weeks' pay at £472.50 gross/week (£13.50/hour x 35 hours/week) = £945 (the 4-week award was not made as there was no obvious basis for an increase given the employment lasted only 2 months); and (c) a possible ACAS Code uplift under s.207A TULRCA 1992, which the judge declined to make as the claimant's complaints about unpaid wages had not been raised as a formal grievance.
The varied judgment orders the first respondent to pay £2,973.18 in total. The claim against the second respondent (Ms Lisa O'Keefe) remains dismissed. The amounts fall within s.62 of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 and the respondent must account to HMRC for tax and national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Confirmed in the original judgment of 31 July 2025 and carried into this reconsideration judgment. | Upheld | — | £401 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages confirmed at £1,627.45 by the claimant on 13 June 2025; not contested by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £1,627 |
| Other | s.38 Employment Act 2002 award - failure to provide written statement of employment particulars. 2 weeks' pay at £472.50 gross/week = £945. Tribunal declined the higher 4-week award (employment was for only 2 months and previously no statement was due in that period). | Upheld | — | £945 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,973
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.38 Employment Act 2002
- s.207A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Schedule A2 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.62 Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.