Case 6009542/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Abigail Obenewaah Asiedu v Hamberley Care FV (Eastleigh) Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009542/2025
- Decision date
- 21 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Elizabeth Gibson
- Venue
- By Cloud Virtual Platform
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Abigail Obenewaah Asiedu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a care assistant employed under the Skilled Worker visa route by Hamberley Care FV (Eastleigh) Limited from June 2023 until her resignation in February 2025, brought a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages totalling £2,861.83 made from her January and February 2025 salaries. Her employment had been preceded by a Conditional Offer Letter and a Final Offer Letter, both of which she had signed and which provided that sponsorship-related costs would be repayable if she left employment within three years.
The Tribunal found that the claimant's signature on those letters constituted prior written agreement to deductions under section 13(1)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996, but that the agreement did not extend to the full £2,861.83 the respondent ultimately deducted. Two specific elements of the respondent's breakdown were not within the scope of what the claimant had agreed to: £113.83 of 'induction logistics' costs (which the Tribunal found were more likely already reflected in the £300 airport-pickup line) and a £500 blanket 'agency fee' for which the respondent did not provide convincing justification. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £613.83 in respect of those unlawful deductions; the claimant is responsible for the payment of tax or National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages claim under Part II Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded. The respondent had deducted £2,861.83 from the claimant's January and February 2025 wages on the basis of a Conditional Offer Letter and Final Offer Letter she had signed. The Tribunal found the agreement to deduct did not extend to the full amount: £113.83 (induction logistics) and £500.00 (a blanket agency fee for administration) were unlawful deductions, totalling £613.83. Other elements of the breakdown (accommodation, airport pick-up, the outstanding loan repayment) were lawfully deducted under the signed agreements. | Upheld | — | £614 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £614
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £614
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 13(1)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 13(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 27 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.