Case 6009633/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Tapiwa Tatenda Kelvin Chabuka v A-Mat Healthcare Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6009633/2025
- Decision date
- 31 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Representation
- Venue
- By video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Tapiwa Tatenda Kelvin Chabuka
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge S Moore, sitting alone via video, gave a reserved liability judgment against A-Mat Healthcare Ltd in respect of a live-in care worker recruited from Zimbabwe. The respondent had admitted breach of contract for failing to reimburse the £1,820 Certificate of Sponsorship fee that the claimant had been compelled to pay on his credit card (a fee that, under Home Office rules, the employer must pay).
The tribunal found that the respondent's contract did not comply with s.1 ERA 1996 (omitting pay intervals, pension, notice and disciplinary information), that the respondent had failed to pay the correct wages between May-September 2022, and that the unauthorised deductions claim for October 2023-November 2024 was well founded (relating to underpayment of an allowance unilaterally withdrawn and £173/month underpayment following promotion to team leader). The tribunal also found that holiday pay had not been paid at the correct rate on termination (rejecting any contention that periods when the claimant was forced to take unpaid breaks could be counted as annual leave), although the claim for accrued leave from May 2022 to 31 December 2023 was not upheld as the claimant had not requested leave or shown that any carry-over exception applied.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded and the tribunal found there was a zero per cent chance the claimant would have been fairly dismissed in any event. A separate remedy hearing is to be listed; only the £1,820 CoS reimbursement was quantified in the liability judgment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Unfair dismissal upheld; tribunal found zero chance the claimant would have been fairly dismissed in any event. Quantum reserved to a future remedy hearing. PDF text truncated at 15,000 of 82,532 chars. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Failure to recompense the claimant for the Certificate of Sponsorship fee (admitted by respondent). Quantum quantified in liability judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,820 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions for the period October 2023 - November 2024 well founded; also breach of contract by failing to pay correct wages May-September 2022. Quantum reserved to remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay not paid at correct rate on termination (May 2024 and December 2024 payments insufficient). Quantum reserved to remedy hearing. Claim for period May 2022-31 Dec 2023 not upheld. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Breach of duty to provide a compliant written statement of employment particulars. Quantum (s.38 EA 2002 award) reserved to remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998 Reg 13(3)(b)
- Working Time Regulations 1998 Reg 13(16)
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.