Case 8002110/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Babikir v T/a Saffron Events UK Represented by: Mr H Anwar - Director Prestige Hospitality Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 8002110/2024
- Decision date
- 9 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a kitchen operative, was employed by the first respondent (Designer Wedding Specialist Ltd, trading as Saffron Events UK) from 28 May 2024 until 30 September 2024, when his resignation took effect. He brought claims of unauthorised deductions from wages, holiday pay, notice pay and failure to give a statement of employment particulars. By consent, the first respondent's name was amended. The Tribunal held the claimant was employed by the first respondent (not the second).
Employment Judge M Kearns, sitting in Glasgow, found there was no meeting of minds on the claimed £17 hourly rate and applied the National Minimum Wage of £11.44 per hour. The claimant had worked 329.5 hours and been paid only £1,980, so was owed £1,789 in arrears as unlawful deductions under s.13 ERA 1996. Holiday pay of £455 (12.07% of NMW-corrected pay) under reg 16 Working Time Regulations 1998 was also unpaid.
The Tribunal awarded one week's statutory notice pay of £471 under ss.86-89 ERA 1996, calculated under ss.224 and 228 ERA 1996 for irregular-hours work. The Tribunal held the first respondent had failed to give a written statement of particulars under s.1 ERA 1996 and remained in breach when proceedings began; it awarded four weeks' pay (£1,885) under s.38 Employment Act 2002. Total payable: £4,600.
Claims and outcomes
4 claims adjudicated| Claim type | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld | — | £1,789 |
| Holiday pay | Upheld | — | £455 |
| Breach of contract | Upheld | — | £471 |
| Other | Upheld | — | £1,885 |
Legal tests applied
8 referencesRemedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,600
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.