Loading page content.
Employer file
Since 2017, Paul Kerfoot, Counsel COVID-19 Statement on behalf of Sir Keith Lindblom, Senior President of Tribunals This has been a remote hearing on the papers which has not objected to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was video. A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined in a remote hearing. has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | 1 |
| 02 | Sex discrimination | 1 |
| 03 | Unlawful deduction from wages | 1 |
| 04 | Working time regulations | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3306551/2020 | 5 August 2022 | England & Wales | Ernest Larbi, husband of Claimant For the | Pregnancy and maternity discrimination, Sex discrimination, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.