Case 1104046/2008 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 110939/2007 & others (see schedule below) Mrs R Crighton & others v Represented by: Thompsons Solicitor Fife Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 1104046/2008
- Decision date
- 28 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian Mcfatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 110939/2007 & others (see schedule below) Mrs R Crighton & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment is a brief disposal of the claim listed under case number 1104046/2008 within a multiple-case schedule. The tribunal records that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and that, on that basis, it was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive liability findings, legal tests, or remedy assessment are set out in the extracted text for this individual case. The judgment is limited to the formal dismissal following withdrawal, and no award of compensation or other remedy is recorded for this case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.