Guilty findings, as they land
Every case below has at least one claim an employment tribunal upheld against the named employer, decided in the last 90 days. Headlines and summaries are factual and attributed to the tribunal — never editorialised — and name only the respondent company, not the individual who brought the claim. Each links through to the full case record and the source judgment on gov.uk.
Employment Judge Adkinson therefore decided the case on the tribunal file and the documents supplied by the claimant. The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy.
It found that the Respondent did not dispute that monies were owed to the Claimant; the only issue was the amount due. The judgment therefore upheld the annual leave payment claim, but it did not determine the monetary figure.
An employment tribunal has upheld unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay claims against The Grill Steakhouse Ltd (in liquidation). The tribunal recorded a total award of £3,306.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered Home Instead Senior Care Limited to pay damages of £157.50. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £78.00.
The tribunal declared that the Respondent made unlawful deductions from the Claimant’s wages. The only substantive outcome recorded in the judgment was that the unlawful deduction from wages claim was upheld.
The claim was issued in the Midlands (East) Employment Tribunals on 6 September 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Adkinson Date determined the matter under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,589.97, described in the judgment as the gross/net sum due. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £306.51.
The tribunal found that Jetview Properties Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £1,611.44 net. The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice.
An employment tribunal has upheld unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay claims against Scarlett & Jo Ltd in Liquidation. The tribunal recorded a total award of £8,474.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered it to pay the gross sum of £200. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £140.03.
The single claim recorded in the extracted judgment succeeds, but the judgment does not set out the substantive facts or reasoning beyond that outcome. The tribunal directed that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a separate Remedy Hearing.
The judgment records that the claim succeeds. The tribunal did not determine remedy in this judgment.
It found that The LK Partnership LLP had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. The claim succeeded on that basis, and the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £609.00.
An employment tribunal has upheld an unlawful deduction from wages claim against P & J Transport Limited. The tribunal recorded a total award of £3,351.
The tribunal found that the respondent, JNW Enterprises Limited, had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered it to pay £869.22 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £990 gross.
It found that the claimant had suffered unlawful deductions from wages and had not been paid for accrued holiday. Both claims were therefore upheld on the basis of the unopposed claim.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant was dismissed without notice by reason of redundancy on 15 July 2025. Norfabs Limited did not enter an appearance and did not attend the CVP hearing before Employment Judge Lancaster at Leeds on 29 April 2026.
The judgment records that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages, that the claimant was dismissed without notice, and that the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The only remedy recorded in the judgment was payment of the gross sum of £599.64.
An employment tribunal has upheld an unfair dismissal claim against Lloyds Banking Group. The tribunal recorded a total award of £6,836.
An employment tribunal has upheld unlawful deduction from wages, holiday pay and breach of contract claims against Principal Building Ltd. The tribunal recorded a total award of £23,326.
Employment Judge Ord recorded that the claimant had suffered unlawful deductions from her wages, had been dismissed in breach of contract, and had not been paid for accrued annual leave. The judgment was a liability decision only.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered Capelli Studio Limited to pay damages of £3,780.00. The tribunal also found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,882.50.
The respondent was Atech Electrical Limited. The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,105.00.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages within section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,614.54.
An employment tribunal has upheld an unlawful deduction from wages claim against Clark Decorating Services Ltd. The tribunal recorded a total award of £800.
The extracted judgment text does not set out further factual findings or a separate liability discussion beyond that order. The outcome recorded on the face of the judgment is therefore that the claim for arrears of pay succeeded.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The only remedy recorded was an order that the respondent pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,456.00.
The tribunal found that Sovereign Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £5,366.00.
The judgment does not set out the underlying merits reasoning; it simply records the success of the unfair dismissal claim. No remedy was assessed at this stage.
The Employment Judge stated that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that the claim succeeds.
The respondent did not dispute the claimant’s complaints. The tribunal therefore entered judgment for the claimant in full on the claims before it.
The tribunal also stated that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. The extracted text does not set out the underlying facts, identify any separate liability findings, or allocate the result between individual complaints.
An employment tribunal has upheld unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract claims against OGV Taproom. The tribunal recorded a total award of £824.
The claim was issued on 22 February 2022 and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, and future hearings were cancelled.
No response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge I McFatridge issued a rule 22 judgment on the available material.
The Employment Judge therefore determined the claim in default on the papers. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages.
No response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge determined the case on the available material under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The tribunal heard oral evidence from both claimants at a remote hearing on 1 December 2022. The respondent did not attend.
This was a Rule 22 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented by the respondent, Makar Marketing Limited.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay compensation of £2,075, made up of a basic award of £1,575 and a compensatory award of £500. The tribunal also found the complaint of breach of contract well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £25,000.
The written record states that judgment was awarded to the claimant in the sums of £538.46 for unlawful deduction of wages, £1,076.92 as damages in respect of unpaid notice pay, and £328.81 for holiday pay, producing a total award of £1,615.38.
The Claimant worked for ICPS Business Management Ltd from 1 October 2014 until 1 July 2025. He brought a claim alleging unauthorised deductions from wages between January and May 2025.
The respondent did not serve an ET3 response. Under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Employment Judge Jack entered judgment for the claimant and ordered LV College Limited to pay £2,000 in respect of notice monies and £120 in respect of holiday pay.
In default, Employment Judge Jones entered judgment for the claimant against RG Plants Limited. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £133.76 gross.
The judgment orders Auditel Rental And Service Limited to pay the claimant the sum of £1,460.80. No further reasoning, legal test, or additional remedy breakdown is set out in the extracted text.
An employment tribunal has upheld an unlawful deduction from wages claim against Spudshack Matcha Man Ltd. The tribunal recorded a total award of £116.
The claim was issued on 8 March 2022 and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £4,451.34 gross.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £748.00 gross. The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £440.00.
A decision appears here only when it has at least one claim the tribunal upheld against the employer and has not been withdrawn under a takedown request. Headlines and standfirsts are generated from the tribunal's own findings — the claim type(s) upheld, the respondent, and (where recorded) the remedy — and are deterministic, not editorial commentary. Once a decision passes 90 days old it drops off this list and the Google News sitemap, but its full case page remains published and unchanged. See full methodology.