Case 1300001/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Betcher v Midland Bacon Co; and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 1300001/2020
- Decision date
- 8 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Choudhry
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Ms A Betcher
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment dated 8 June 2020, signed by Employment Judge Choudhry, records that by consent the claimant's claims against the first and second respondents were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant.
The extracted text does not identify the individual heads of claim or set out any findings on liability. It records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the claimant's claims against the first and second respondents were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The specific head of claim is taken from the case listing because the extracted text does not identify it separately. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's claims against the first and second respondents were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The specific head of claim is taken from the case listing because the extracted text does not identify it separately. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant's claims against the first and second respondents were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. The specific head of claim is taken from the case listing because the extracted text does not identify it separately. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.