Case 1300011/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs El Huseini, accompanied by Mr D Melville retired solicitor For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 1300011/2018
- Decision date
- 15 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mrs El Huseini, accompanied by Mr D Melville retired solicitor For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the earlier judgment of Employment Judge Broughton dated 2 August 2016 and the reconsideration decision dated 6 November 2016 were judicial decisions determining the claimant's earlier disability discrimination complaints in case 1300499/2016. On that basis, the present complaints of unlawful discrimination because of disability arising on or before 20 March 2016, including the direct discrimination and s15 Equality Act 2010 matters identified in the issues, were res judicata and were struck out.
The tribunal also held that the complaints of unlawful deduction from wages and protected disclosure detriment arising on or before 20 March 2016 were res judicata and struck out. The claimant's application to amend the complaints succeeded to the extent identified in the later case management orders, which allowed additional allegations to be identified as direct discrimination and discrimination arising from disability, but the respondent's application to strike out under Rule 37(1) of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 did not succeed. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held that the present disability discrimination complaints arising on or before 20 March 2016 were res judicata because of the earlier judgment of Employment Judge Broughton dated 2 August 2016 and the reconsideration decision dated 6 November 2016. The judgment refers to direct discrimination under s13 Equality Act 2010 and unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability under s15 Equality Act 2010. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the complaints of unlawful deduction from wages arising on or before 20 March 2016 had already been determined and were res judicata, so they were struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal held that the complaints in respect of protected disclosure detriment arising on or before 20 March 2016 had already been determined and were res judicata, so they were struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- res judicata
- Rule 37(1) Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.