Case 1300024/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Fletcher v Early Years Education Centre EYEC Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1300024/2023
- Decision date
- 20 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wedderspoon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Fletcher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 default judgment after the respondent did not present a response within the relevant time limit. The claimant was Mrs J Fletcher and the respondent was Early Years Education Centre EYEC Ltd. On that basis, the tribunal proceeded to determine the claim on the papers.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered it to pay £1,751.67 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £549.36.
The tribunal stated that it did not have jurisdiction to award compensation for the length of time waiting. The total sum payable by the respondent was therefore £2,301.03 gross, and the judgment noted that the respondent was responsible for deductions of income tax and National Insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,751.67, subject to deductions of income tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,752 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £549.36. | Upheld | — | £549 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,301
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.