Mr. M A Rao v Smithers MSE Limited — 2025

Case reference: 1300024/2025
Decision date: 17 July 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Faulkner Approved

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr. M A Rao

Respondent

Smithers MSE Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment records that Claim 1300024/2025 was dismissed in its entirety upon withdrawal. The extracted text does not identify the underlying substantive complaint in that claim, and the judgment contains no merits findings on it.

The tribunal also recorded that any complaint within Claim 1300032/2025 of protected disclosure detriment contrary to section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed upon withdrawal. It further stated that the remaining complaints within Claim 1300032/2025 were unaffected by the judgment, so no merits decision was made on those other matters.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Claim 1300024/2025 was dismissed in its entirety upon withdrawal. The extracted text does not identify the underlying substantive cause of action.	Withdrawn	—	—
Whistleblowing	Any complaint within Claim 1300032/2025 of protected disclosure detriment contrary to section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed upon withdrawal. The judgment states that the remaining complaints within Claim 1300032/2025 were unaffected.	Withdrawn	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.