Case 1300038/2022 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance For the v International Currency Exchange Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1300038/2022
- Decision date
- 30 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney Appearances
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No attendance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the matter on the papers after the claimant did not respond to directions requiring her to confirm she was content for the case to be decided on the papers and to file any submissions. The respondent confirmed it was content for paper determination and relied on its existing Grounds of Resistance and 13 June 2023 letter. The claim form had identified claims for unlawful deductions from pay, statutory notice pay, accrued but unpaid holiday pay and statutory redundancy pay, but it had not quantified them.
In the absence of any response from the claimant, the tribunal said the value of the claims was to be taken from the sums asserted by the respondent, which were the only quantification available to the tribunal. It upheld the unlawful deductions from pay claim at £60.89 and upheld the statutory redundancy pay claim at £1,332.40. The holiday pay claim and the notice pay claim were dismissed. The judgment did not state an aggregate total award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The deductions from pay claim was upheld and assessed in the sum of £60.89. | Upheld | — | £61 |
| Holiday pay | The accrued but unpaid holiday pay claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The statutory notice pay claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The statutory redundancy pay claim was upheld and assessed in the sum of £1,332.40. | Upheld | — | £1,332 |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.