Case 1300054/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1300054/2019
- Decision date
- 14 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dimbylow Signed
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the open preliminary hearing in Birmingham on 14 August 2019, Employment Judge Dimbylow heard the claimant, Mr C O’Neill, appearing in person, and the respondent, UPS Limited, represented by Ms K Balmer, Counsel. The issue decided was whether the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal found that the claimant had failed to establish that he was disabled for Equality Act purposes. As a result, his claims for disability discrimination were dismissed. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days, and no such request was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The claimant failed to establish that he was a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010, so the disability discrimination claims were dismissed at the open preliminary hearing on 14 August 2019. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.