Case 1300061/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms O Lynch v R2 Hanley Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1300061/2020
- Decision date
- 8 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kelly Tribunal
- Venue
- Midlands West
- Panel members
- Mrs Howard, Mr Hutchinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms O Lynch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Midlands West Employment Tribunal by CVP on 6, 7 and 8 April 2021 before Employment Judge Kelly, with Mrs Howard and Mr Hutchinson sitting as tribunal members. The claimant, Ms O Lynch, appeared in person and the respondent, R2 Hanley Limited, was represented by Mr Murphy, consultant.
The judgment records a unanimous decision that the claimant's claims were dismissed. No separate findings, liability split, or remedy award are set out in the extracted judgment text provided.
On the information in the judgment extract, the tribunal therefore disposed of the race discrimination claim, the unlawful deduction from wages claim, and the working time claim by dismissing them all.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.