Case 1300063/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Thomas Cook (in compulsory liquidation) & others (see attached schedule) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1300063/2020
- Decision date
- 4 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letters dated 19 August 2022, the tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why their claims should not be struck out for not being actively pursued. The claimants did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Ainscough ordered that the claims be struck out. The judgment records no substantive determination on liability and no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Mrs G Wakeling's claim in case 1300063/2020; the judgment does not specify the underlying legal claim type. The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Mr G Latham's claim in case 1301313/2021; the judgment does not specify the underlying legal claim type. The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Mr K Davenport's claim in case 1301488/2021; the judgment does not specify the underlying legal claim type. The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.