Case 1300070/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Johnson v Prysmian Cables & Systems Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1300070/2024
- Decision date
- 7 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Edmonds Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Johnson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in Birmingham by CVP on 26, 27 February 2025 and 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 March 2025 before Employment Judge Edmonds. The judgment records two complaints: constructive unfair dismissal and breach of contract in relation to notice pay.
Both complaints were dismissed. The tribunal stated that the complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was not well founded, and it also found that the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was not well founded. The extracted judgment does not record any monetary award or separate remedy calculation.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.