Case 1300082/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Not present or represented — 2020
- Case reference
- 1300082/2020
- Decision date
- 29 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dimbylow Note
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was conducted remotely at Birmingham on 29 July 2020. The respondent was not present or represented. The tribunal found that the claims had been brought out of time, but extended time for the redundancy payment claim because it considered it just and equitable to do so, and extended time for the breach of contract claims because it was not reasonably practicable for them to have been brought in time.
The tribunal declared that the claimant had been made redundant by the respondent and awarded a redundancy payment of £567. It also found that the claim for damages for breach of contract in respect of holiday accrued but not taken was well-founded and awarded £176.40 gross.
The tribunal further found that the breach of contract claim concerning failure to give notice or make a payment in lieu of notice was well-founded and awarded £378 gross. The total sum payable to the claimant was £1,121.40.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal extended time for the redundancy payment claim and declared that the claimant was made redundant by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £567 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment described this as a breach of contract claim over holiday accrued but not taken; classified as holiday_pay because the monetary award is specifically for accrued holiday. | Upheld | — | £176 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal upheld the breach of contract claim for failure to give notice or make a payment in lieu of notice. | Upheld | — | £378 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,121
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.