Case 1300088/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Smart v Shyre Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1300088/2021
- Decision date
- 19 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fitzgerald
- Venue
- Midland West
- Panel members
- Ms M Stewart, Mr E Stanley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Smart
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Midland West Employment Tribunal by hybrid hearing on 15, 16, 18 and 19 May 2023 before Employment Judge Fitzgerald, Ms M Stewart and Mr E Stanley. Mr P Smart represented himself and Shyre Limited was represented by Mr Baker, Legal Advocate.
The judgment records that the Claimant's wrongful dismissal claim succeeded. The tribunal awarded him £2,174.13 net in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also recorded that the Claimant's disability discrimination claims failed. Those claims were pleaded as direct discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and discrimination arising from disability, and they were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Award stated as £2,174.13 net. | Upheld | — | £2,174 |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal dismissed the claims of direct discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and discrimination arising from disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,174
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.