Case 1300090/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Everton Rooms v Inglewood Residential Rest Home Ltd RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 1300090/2025
- Decision date
- 9 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney Appearances
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Everton Rooms
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in the Midlands West Employment Tribunal on 9 July 2025 before Employment Judge Gidney, with Mrs Corinne Cambell appearing for the Claimant and Mr Andrew Scott for the Respondent. The only claim identified in the judgment was a claim for unlawful deductions from wages under s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal recorded that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. No substantive findings on liability were made, and the judgment does not identify any remedy because the claim did not proceed to determination on the merits.
The tribunal stated that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written judgment being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the s.13 ERA 1996 unlawful deductions from wages claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.