Case 1300091/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Barnett v Worcestershire County Council — 2021
- Case reference
- 1300091/2021
- Decision date
- 14 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Connolly Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Barnett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Birmingham, heard in private by telephone/remotely on 14 July 2021, Employment Judge Connolly recorded that Mr C Barnett had brought claims against Worcestershire County Council for marriage or civil partnership discrimination and victimisation. The judgment contains no substantive findings on liability and no factual conclusions about the underlying allegations.
The only outcome recorded is that the claims were dismissed by consent and upon withdrawal. The sentence does not separately identify which of the two listed claims was disposed of by consent and which was withdrawn, and the judgment records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marriage or civil partnership discrimination | The judgment states that the claims were dismissed by consent and upon withdrawal, but it does not expressly allocate which of the two listed claims was disposed of by which route. This outcome follows the order of the claims in the sentence. | Dismissed | Marriage / civil partnership | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment states that the claims were dismissed by consent and upon withdrawal, but it does not expressly allocate which of the two listed claims was disposed of by which route. This outcome follows the order of the claims in the sentence. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.