Case 1300124/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Powell v NUL Hotel Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1300124/2020
- Decision date
- 2 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Powell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss J Powell’s case was heard by video at Birmingham on 2 December 2020 before Employment Judge Flood sitting alone. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend or have representation. The tribunal upheld all three complaints brought before it: unlawful deduction of wages, accrued holiday pay, and breach of contract in relation to notice pay.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £109.48 for unpaid wages, £387.51 for 47.2 hours of accrued holiday pay, and £328.40 as damages for breach of contract. The total awarded was £825.39. Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing, and the written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint relating to unpaid wages; tribunal ordered payment of £109.48. | Upheld | — | £109 |
| Holiday pay | Complaint for accrued holiday pay; tribunal ordered payment of £387.51 in respect of 47.2 hours accrued holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £388 |
| Breach of contract | Complaint for notice pay; tribunal awarded £328.40 as damages for breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £328 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £825
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.