Case 1300140/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Mir v Audatex (uk) Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 1300140/2019
- Decision date
- 1 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Camp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Mir
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment on withdrawal. Employment Judge Camp recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant under rule 52. No substantive liability findings are set out in the extracted text, and no remedy was awarded.
The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type beyond the case listing context, so the only certain outcome recorded in the judgment itself is that the claim was withdrawn and the proceedings were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records no substantive findings. It states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant under rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.