Case 1300168/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Ogunrinola v Trident Reach the People Charity (a company limited by guarantee) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1300168/2020
- Decision date
- 5 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Connolly
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Ogunrinola
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing heard by CVP in Birmingham on 5 October 2020, Employment Judge Connolly sat alone and dealt with Ms J Ogunrinola's claims against Trident Reach the People Charity. The judgment records that the direct religious discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.
The tribunal also held that the unfair dismissal claim and the breach of contract claim had not been presented within the statutory time limit. It found that it had not been reasonably practicable for them to be presented in time, and both claims were dismissed on that basis.
The judgment states that the final hearing listed for 4 to 7 May 2021 was vacated. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment records that the direct religious discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed at preliminary hearing because it was not presented within the statutory time limit, the tribunal finding it was not reasonably practicable to do so in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed at preliminary hearing because it was not presented within the statutory time limit, the tribunal finding it was not reasonably practicable to do so in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.