Case 1300180/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Dalloway Mrs S Dean v Sandwell Crossroad Care Attendant Scheme Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1300180/2024
- Decision date
- 30 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bansal Members
- Venue
- Midlands West
- Panel members
- Mrs N Chavda, Mr R Virdee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Dalloway Mrs S Dean
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat with Employment Judge Bansal and lay members Mrs N Chavda and Mr R Virdee. The respondent did not present a valid response on time and did not contest the claim, but the tribunal still determined the case under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The claimants' complaint of automatic unfair dismissal contrary to s.103A ERA 1996 was found not well founded and was dismissed. Their complaint of ordinary unfair dismissal contrary to ss.94 and 98 ERA 1996 was also found not well founded and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal contrary to s.103A ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Ordinary unfair dismissal contrary to ss.94 and 98 ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 21
- s.103A ERA 1996
- s.94 ERA 1996
- s.98 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.