Case 1300187/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss O Ihemadu v Mofor Solutions Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1300187/2020
- Decision date
- 14 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dimbylow Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss O Ihemadu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Dimbylow found that Mofor Solutions Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss O Ihemadu's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the net sum of £1,309.21 for that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's expenses and ordered payment of £542.34. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £704.50. The judgment records no separate liability analysis beyond those findings and orders.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,309 |
| Other | The judgment refers to failure to pay the claimant's expenses. | Upheld | — | £542 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to failure to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £705 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,556
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.