Case 1300213/2024 · Employment Tribunal
In person Case Number: 1300213/2024 2 For the v Mr W.Haines – Legal Consultant — 2024
- Case reference
- 1300213/2024
- Decision date
- 31 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Algazy K.C.
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person Case Number: 1300213/2024 2 For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent in which the tribunal recorded that terms of settlement had been agreed between Ms A. Tanveer and Transition Accountants Limited, formerly known as Morgan Reach Development Ltd. The judgment did not decide the underlying merits of the case. Instead, it stayed the proceedings for 21 days, until 16.00 on 21 November 2024, to allow the settlement to be implemented.
The settlement term recorded in the judgment was a payment by the respondent to the claimant of £1,857.54. The order also provided that, unless the claimant applied for the matter to be relisted during the stay period, the claim would stand as dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant at the expiry of the 21 days. No separate award components were identified in the judgment and no legal test was stated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that terms of settlement were agreed and the proceedings were stayed for 21 days to allow implementation of the settlement; it does not make merits findings on this claim. | Settled | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that terms of settlement were agreed and the proceedings were stayed for 21 days to allow implementation of the settlement; it does not make merits findings on this claim. | Settled | Sex | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,858
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.