Case 1300239/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1300239/2020
- Decision date
- 17 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr K Hutchinson, Ms L Clark
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Birmingham by CVP on 15 to 17 March 2021 before Employment Judge Broughton, with Mr K Hutchinson and Ms L Clark as the lay members. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms B Balmelli, counsel.
In the written judgment record, the tribunal stated that the claimant's claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination under ss13, 15 and 20 of the Equality Act 2010 failed and were dismissed. The extracted text does not include the tribunal's substantive reasons for those outcomes.
The judgment note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record. No monetary award is recorded in the extracted judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment refers to disability discrimination under ss13, 15 and 20 Equality Act 2010 and dismisses those claims. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.