Case 1300240/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Linda Pearce v Shayler Saddlery Limited Date: 15 April 2020 — 2020
- Case reference
- 1300240/2020
- Decision date
- 15 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lloyd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Linda Pearce
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Lloyd dealt with the matter under Rule 21 on the basis of the available information. The tribunal recorded that Mrs Linda Pearce's claims were for a statutory redundancy payment and notice pay against Shayler Saddlery Limited.
Both claims were dismissed in their entirety. The tribunal found that the redundancy payment claim had been presented outside the statutory time limit of 6 months, and the notice pay claim had been presented outside the statutory time limit of 3 months.
The judgment also stated that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have made both claims within the permitted time limits. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Dismissed because the claim was presented outside the statutory 6-month time limit and it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have made the claim within the permitted time limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed because the notice pay claim was presented outside the statutory 3-month time limit and it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have made the claim within the permitted time limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.