Case 1300248/2024 · Employment Tribunal
MRS CHRISTINE VOICE v The Executive Committee and Members of Digby South Residents Association for the Time Being — 2025
- Case reference
- 1300248/2024
- Decision date
- 28 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ali
- Venue
- Midlands West
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MRS CHRISTINE VOICE
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Ali on 28 March 2025, substituted the respondent name to "The Executive Committee And Members Of Digby South Residents Association For The Time Being". The claim before the tribunal was for a statutory redundancy payment, and that claim succeeded.
The tribunal calculated the claimant's statutory redundancy payment entitlement at £9,378. It then gave credit for £2,500 already paid by the respondent towards that entitlement, so the outstanding balance ordered to be paid was £6,878.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the Claimant's statutory redundancy payment claim succeeded and calculated entitlement at £9,378. It credited £2,500 already paid towards redundancy, leaving £6,878 outstanding. | Upheld | — | £6,878 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,878
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.