Case 1300280/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Jones v FirstPort Retirement Property Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1300280/2024
- Decision date
- 10 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Jones
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the respondent, FirstPort Retirement Property Services Limited, was represented by counsel and that the claimant, Mr D Jones, appeared in person. The tribunal amended the respondent's name to the form used in the judgment.
The substantive claims are not identified in the extracted text. The judgment states that the respondent confirmed no application for costs would be made and that, because the claims had been withdrawn by the claimant, they stood dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No monetary award or other remedy is recorded. The judgment is signed by Employment Judge Perry and dated 10 December 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the substantive claim type(s). It records that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimant and therefore stood dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.