Case 1300283/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Cooper v Rightio Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1300283/2019
- Decision date
- 6 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Meichen Appearances
- Venue
- Birmingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Cooper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss K Cooper brought claims against Rightio Ltd in the Birmingham Employment Tribunal. The written judgment records that the holiday pay claim was dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. No remedy was awarded in relation to that claim.
The tribunal also dealt with claims for unfair dismissal and failure to pay notice pay. It found both were not well founded and dismissed them. The judgment does not set out reasons in the written record, stating that reasons were given orally at the hearing and would not be provided in writing unless requested.
No other claim outcomes, legal tests, or monetary awards are recorded in the supplied text. The written judgment is limited to the final disposals and does not identify any separate compensation calculation.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment records this claim as dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claim was not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to a failure to pay notice pay and records that this claim was not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.