Case 1300285/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Not present or represented — 2019
- Case reference
- 1300285/2020
- Decision date
- 8 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dimbylow Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claims were not disputed and no valid response had been presented. The respondent was not present or represented at the remote hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages, failed to pay accrued but untaken holiday pay, and breached the claimant's contract by failing to give notice or payment in lieu of notice. The judgment also found that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment.
The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded compensation for loss of accrued employment rights. It also found that the respondent failed to provide a written statement of main terms and conditions of employment contrary to s.38 Employment Act 2002 and awarded compensation for that failure.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum awarded. | Upheld | — | £532 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay for holidays accrued but not taken. | Upheld | — | £935 |
| Breach of contract | The breach found was failure to give notice or payment in lieu of notice. | Upheld | — | £776 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £519 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment awarded compensation for loss of accrued employment rights only; recoupment did not apply and no loss of earnings was sought. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Other | The judgment found failure to provide a written statement of main terms and conditions of employment contrary to s.38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £692 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,954
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Rule 21
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.