Case 1300286/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Sikora v Azzurri Restaurants Limited (in Administration) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1300286/2020
- Decision date
- 26 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Platt
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Sikora
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr M Sikora brought complaints of unlawful deductions from wages in respect of statutory sick pay and tips, failure to provide a written statement of dismissal, failure to provide a statement of written particulars of employment, and whistleblowing under sections 47B or 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
All of the listed complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on liability, remedy, or the merits of the claims, and no monetary award is set out.
The decision is recorded as a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52 and is dated 26 July 2024.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint in respect of statutory sick pay and tips; dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Complaint for failure to provide a written statement of dismissal; dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Complaint for failure to provide a statement of written particulars of employment; dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Complaint under sections 47B or 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996; dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.