Case 1300314/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Greening v The London Edge Group (In Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1300314/2020
- Decision date
- 22 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Greening
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mrs K Greening, brought proceedings against The London Edge Group (in Voluntary Liquidation). The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type in the extracted text; it only resolves the case by strike out.
By a letter dated 14 July 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Broughton held that the claim should be struck out. No monetary remedy was awarded or recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not state the underlying cause of action; it only records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 14 July 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.