Case 1300349/2024 · Employment Tribunal
MR SAMUEL KOFI ADDAI v Kings Guardings Solutions Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1300349/2024
- Decision date
- 9 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N. Clarke
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Dr M. Stewart MBE, Mr E. Stanley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MR SAMUEL KOFI ADDAI
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Birmingham on 6 to 9 May 2025 before Employment Judge N. Clarke, Dr M. Stewart MBE and Mr E. Stanley. The claimant, Mr Samuel Kofi Addai, appeared on his own behalf and the respondent was represented by counsel, Ms C. Goodman.
In the judgment dated 9 May 2025, the tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claims for unfair dismissal, whistle-blowing detriments and dismissal were unfounded and were dismissed. No separate remedy, award or liability breakdown is recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment refers to 'Whistle-Blowing Detriments' and dismisses the claim(s). | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment also refers to a separate claim of 'Dismissal' without further qualification. This has been classified as other because the extracted text does not specify the legal basis. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.