Case 1300368/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Biddulph v Wincanton Group Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1300368/2020
- Decision date
- 6 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Biddulph
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claim. Following that withdrawal, the proceedings were dismissed under rule 52.
The judgment does not set out findings on the merits of the breach of contract or unlawful deduction from wages matters identified in the listing categories, and no remedy or monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The gov.uk listing categories identify breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages. The judgment itself only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, without separately addressing individual claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing categories identify breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages. The judgment itself only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, without separately addressing individual claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.