Case 1300384/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Sutherland v Pat Black’s Caribbean Kitchen (Martineau Place) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1300384/2020
- Decision date
- 14 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Sutherland
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy Rule 21 judgment dated 14 July 2020, Employment Judge Johnson recorded that Mrs J Sutherland's claims for unfair dismissal, unpaid redundancy payment, notice pay, holiday pay, unpaid wages and unpaid annual leave succeeded against Pat Black’s Caribbean Kitchen (Martineau Place) Limited. The judgment also recorded a whistleblowing complaint, but that complaint did not proceed to a substantive determination.
The whistleblowing complaint was dismissed following the claimant's withdrawal in her email to the tribunal dated 24 February 2020. No monetary remedy was assessed in this judgment, because the tribunal directed that the claimant's remedy would be determined later at a remedy hearing.
The listed hearing on 27 and 28 August 2020 in the Birmingham Employment Tribunal was converted into a one-day remedy hearing on 27 August 2020 at 9.45am.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The extracted text reads 'unpaid annual'; this appears to refer to unpaid annual leave under the Working Time Regulations. | Upheld | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment says the complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant in her email of 24 February 2020. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.