Case 1300396/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Pritchard v Mr D McKenna — 2020
- Case reference
- 1300396/2020
- Decision date
- 22 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Pritchard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment on withdrawal in case 1300396/2020, heard by Employment Judge Miller sitting alone at Birmingham on 22 June 2020. The claimant was Mrs R Pritchard and the respondent was Mr D McKenna. The judgment records that the proceedings were heard in private by telephone.
The tribunal recorded that the proceedings against Mr D McKenna were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. No findings of fact or liability were made on the merits of the claims in the judgment text supplied.
No remedy was awarded or addressed in the judgment. The extracted text does not identify any legal test applied beyond the rule 52 withdrawal disposal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings against Mr D McKenna were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. The extracted text does not separately identify the claim beyond the case metadata. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. The extracted text does not separately identify this claim in the body of the judgment. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. The extracted text does not separately identify this claim in the body of the judgment. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.