Case 1300409/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Green v The Falcon Inn at Woore Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1300409/2025
- Decision date
- 1 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Faulkner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Green
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 11 February 2025. The Respondent failed to present a valid Response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The Tribunal proceeded to determine the matter on the papers.
The Tribunal found that the Claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded and ordered the Respondent to pay £1,128.00 gross in respect of the period 16 December to 29 December 2023. The Tribunal further found that the complaint of failure to pay accrued but untaken holiday entitlement on termination was well-founded and ordered a further payment of £768.00 gross.
The total ordered sum is £1,896.00 gross, subject to such deductions for tax and national insurance as the Respondent is required to make by law.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded for the period 16 December to 29 December 2023; £1,128.00 gross awarded. | Upheld | — | £1,128 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the complaint of failure to pay accrued but untaken holiday entitlement on termination well-founded; £768.00 gross awarded. Categorised as holiday_pay rather than working_time as the claim concerns payment for accrued leave on termination. | Upheld | — | £768 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,896
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of The Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.