Case 1300443/2019 · Employment Tribunal
in person / Ms Turner, lay representative v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1300443/2019
- Decision date
- 28 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton Members
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Ms Shenton, Ms Forrest
Parties
1 namedClaimant
in person / Ms Turner, lay representative
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Birmingham by CVP on 14 to 24 June 2021 before Employment Judge Broughton and lay members Ms Shenton and Ms Forrest. The claimant, Mr G Asquith, appeared in person with Ms Turner as lay representative; the respondent was represented by Ms Johns, counsel.
The judgment records the final outcome only. The tribunal dismissed Mr Asquith's claims of unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, and age discrimination. No remedy award is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The supplied judgment text records that this claim failed and was dismissed; no further reasoning or remedy is included in the extracted text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The supplied judgment text records that this claim failed and was dismissed; no further reasoning or remedy is included in the extracted text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Age discrimination | The supplied judgment text records that this claim failed and was dismissed; no further reasoning or remedy is included in the extracted text. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.